Updated Monday, July 28, 2014 as of 6:37 PM ET
Evaluating Alts: Essential Criteria
Wednesday, July 2, 2014

The popularity of alternative investments continues to increase.

The sales pitch for alternatives is the low or negative correlations to the stock market. The argument is that portfolios with a healthy dose of alternatives will stand up to the next market meltdown much better than the traditional asset classes of stocks, bonds and cash.

Alternative investments such as bear market and managed futures have negative correlations, and market neutral funds have a very low correlation. Having a low or negative correlation to traditional assets is one important essential for a good alternative investment.

However, many advisors forget the second essential criterion for a good alternative investment: a positive expected return. It so happens that, according to Morningstar, all three of the aforementioned categories have five year negative returns. In fact, most of the alternative investment classes have low or negative returns, according to Morningstar.

Are alternatives just having five bad years? Will they zig (go up) the next time stocks zag (plunge)? Perhaps, yet the question remains whether they will have positive long-term returns. Though they are plagued with very high costs, thatís only part of the problem. Certainly, bear market funds donít have long-run positive returns if we expect capitalism to work and stocks to increase over the long-run.

Other categories, like market neutral or managed futures, are essentially zero sum games. This doesn't mean there aren't specific funds within each category that have had handsome returns. Even in zero-sum game categories, some funds must be winners and can cover their costs.

But money keeps flowing into alternative investments even with low or negative returns. Before you invest your clientsí funds in an alternative investment, ask yourself how the category is performing. If you are investing in a fund showing great results in a category of low or negative returns, you may be doing classic performance chasing.

I tell clients they could take half of their portfolio to Las Vegas and gamble it. The outcome will have no correlation with the stock market, but that doesnít make it a smart thing to do.

Allan S. Roth, a Financial Planning contributing writer, is founder of the planning firm Wealth Logic in Colorado Springs, Colo. He also writes for CBS MoneyWatch.com and has taught investing at three universities.

Read more:

(2) Comments
The point of positive expected returns is a very good one. Unfortunately, Morningstar may not be the best source, or at least shouldn't be the only source, in determining how these asset classes will perform. I could argue about whether Managed Futures is actually a zero-sum game, but there is little debate that Managed Futures suffer from low interest rates because of the amount of cash they must hold, and the Federal Reserve manipulation of markets has really done a number on trend-following strategies. To understand how Managed Futures perform in the absence of QE requires looking at how the privately-managed accounts performed before they were reorganized as 40-act funds and Morningstar began following them. At least some of the long-term returns are pretty impressive if you assume that QE is an anomaly that will not be repeated anytime soon.
Posted by JERRY V | Monday, June 02 2014 at 8:18PM ET
We have a CTA fund here in Australia targeting vol of 16 that has punched out 15%pa since inception a little over 6 years ago. Also a multi-strategy/multi- manager Fund that has done around 7% with a vol of 5.


Posted by Vaughan H | Wednesday, July 02 2014 at 9:30PM ET
Post a Comment
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
2014 Summer Reading List for Advisors

Current Issue

The June Issue is now online!


Industry Events

August 10, 2014 |

September 9, 2014 |

September 17, 2014 |

September 20, 2014 |

September 28, 2014 |

Already a subscriber? Log in here