Updated Tuesday, September 1, 2015 as of 8:24 PM ET

Why Benchmarking Alts Can Prove Them Obsolete

Benchmarking alternatives that fit in clients’ portfolios can be tricky. But for some alternatives, once you consider the benchmark, the more difficult part is justifying the investment's place in the portfolio.

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All On Wall Street articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to exclusive industry white paper downloads, web seminars, blog discussions, the iPad App, CE Exams, and conference discounts. Qualified members may also choose to receive our free monthly magazine and any of our daily or weekly e-newsletters covering the latest breaking news, opinions from industry leaders, developing trends and growth strategies.

Already Registered?

Comments (1)
To be honest, I am quite skeptical about most alternative and their ability to deliver risk adjusted returns in products that offer daily liquidity. However, these "benchmarks" of Mr. Roth's are some sort of a bad joke. While Mr. Roth says the benchmark for managed futures is zero minus the expenses, here are the facts of the Barclays CTA index going back to January 1980.

Compound Annual Return 10.23%
Sharpe Ratio 0.38
Worst Drawdown 15.66%
Correlation vs S&P 500 0.01
Correlation vs US Bonds 0.13
Correlation vs World Bonds 0.00

Does that look like zero minus expenses? This index has been negative the past 3-4 years which corresponds to the period these products have been available in mutual funds. Applying inappropriate benchmarks to anything is a waste of time, pure and simple.
Posted by Ted S | Tuesday, June 24 2014 at 2:41PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Already a subscriber? Log in here