Free newsletters - Wealth Advisor, Breaking News and More
Earn Free CE Credits
Free Seminars and Podcasts from Industry Experts
Access our Discussion Boards
BlogsThe Product Guru
Are All These Retirement Products Necessary?
By Lee Conrad
March 31, 2011
¦
Advertisement
For this installment of Product Guru, I’d like to turn things over to you, the readers. I’d like to hear about your retirement/product concerns directly.
First, a little background. At our most recent retirement roundtable last year, one of the panelists made the comment that advisors already have all the necessary financial products they need. They have all the components at their disposal, which, put together the right way can achieve almost anything a client needs. What’s lacking, he said, were enough good modeling tools, especially those that incorporate client accountability into the equation. That is, clients set up a plan based on the fact that they will spend, say, $10,000 per month, and then when they really spend $15,000, they often blame the fact that their product choice it too limited.
I think about that every time I receive a press release or announcement of the latest new product for retirement. And there have been a lot of them. Manufacturers, after all, are paid to produce, regardless of the opinion of a panelist on an industry roundtable.
Most of the products are designed for the drawdown phase obviously. One of the most recent examples, which we wrote about already, comes from Putnam. It announced a new suite of income-oriented funds specifically designed for retirement. This one used absolute-return funds that focus on returns over a three-year period with less volatility than similar, traditional asset classes. There have been others, as well, and diversification, less volatility and lower correlation are the big objectives in most of these new products.
In fact, diversification through alternative investing was the theme of the day at a recent media luncheon at Genworth Financial Wealth Management. The main idea was that as traditional asset classes have become more closely correlated over the years, true diversification has become harder to achieve. Then there is the possibility to invest in volatility itself. As I wrote last week in this space, the Chicago Board Options Exchange has worked to expand volatility-based investing, or, specifically, the use of its VIX method of measuring volatility.
So there are more choices than ever. But still, I wonder, was our panelist right? Are these new products largely unnecessary? And if so, is your clients’ biggest challenge the fact that they don’t stay within a pre-determined spending plan? Here is where I’d like to turn things over to you. Please leave your thoughts below on these issues.
0 Comments
Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to IAG Blogs, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Nearly every day, I get a notice touting the launch of some new ETF. And at this point, most of them represent some fringe aspect of the investment world. Small-cap stocks from one certain country in the Middle East, say, or a fund from Africa that deals with water infrastructure. Sometimes, they are sliced so thinly that there are just a handful of companies in the underlying index. Useful perhaps, but probably only for a
Who exactly is feeling so confident about the markets? Are they the same people who arent saving anything and failed a (very easy) financial literacy test?
You need to know where your profits are coming from, but to truly serve your clients, it would also be nice to know how their behavior separates them into groups.
A tiny hedge fund scans thousands of articles to gauge investor sentimentwhen there is an optimistic shift in tone, it buys and waits for others to pile on.
ûAs Group Managing Editor of SourceMedia's Investment Advisor Group, Lee oversees all editorial aspects of our Bank Investment Consultant brand. He has spent half his 20-year journalism career at SourceMedia and legacy companies. Before taking over BIC in April 2011, he spent more than three years as managing editor of On Wall Street. And before that he was a senior editor at U.S. Banker magazine for four years. He also worked as an editor in the newsletter unit of legacy divisions of the company for three years, covering various aspects of the fixed-income markets.
ûLee started his career as a reporter at the St. Louis Business Journal after graduating from the University of Missouri with a B.S. in economics. He is currently working toward an MBA at Baruch College, part of City University of New York.
0 Comments
Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.
Add Your Comments...