Lottery Scam Snares Senior Client


Finally, after 17 years, Scott Sargent's client was ready to make his first withdrawal from his brokerage account. The problem was it was for the worst possible reason.

The elderly client, then 81-years-old, was convinced that he'd won $5 million in a "Costa Rican lottery" and wanted to withdraw $15,000 to cover "the rest of the taxes" on his windfall, he told Sargent, a financial advisor with Wells Fargo Advisors in Newport Beach, Calif. The senior investor had already wired $20,000 to a sweepstakes outfit and was determined to send more.

"I know you're going to tell me that I'm being ripped off, but I've done a lot of research and it's completely legitimate," the client insisted. "I've already been on the phone with the Federal Reserve."

As hard as he tried, Sargent couldn't convince the client that he really hadn't won $5 million and that the whole thing was indeed a scam. Sargent tried to dissuade him from sending the organization more money, urging him to at least wait a few days, but the client only grew agitated. "I need the money," he said. "It's my money."

Thus began Sargent's 10-month odyssey with the client and later his family. Unable to reason with him, Sargent reluctantly reached out to his children and discovered that they were fully aware of the situation and were at their wit's end trying to convince their father that he was being robbed. He had exhausted all his other bank accounts, sending some $150,000 to multiple people around the globe. His Wells Fargo account was all he had left.

Through it all, Wells Fargo Advisors stood by its guns and refused to release the funds.

It seems like an open-and-shut case, but a complicating factor made the situation very tricky for the firm. A doctor and a lawyer brought in to assess the client's mental capacity determined that he was fine mentally, leaving Wells Fargo in a very awkward spot.

Legally financial institutions are required to honor their clients' instructions unless they have reason to believe the clients lack capacity and especially if they suspect that someone is taking advantage of that diminished capacity, said Robert Freedman, a partner in the New York office of law firm Schiff Hardin.

Since a doctor determined that there was nothing wrong with Sargent's client, Wells Fargo faced a legal dilemma as it tried to balance its duty to follow the client's instruction with its desire to protect him from financial predators.  

Such legal dilemmas are likely to become more commonplace as the nation's 76 million baby boomers retire and begin developing cognitive issues, which increase with age, say experts. Some 10 million Americans are estimated to have dementia or suffer from some level of cognitive impairment, according to research by David Laibson, a professor of economics at Harvard University.

"Kudos to Wells Fargo for having a backbone and doing the right thing," said Bernard Krooks, a founding partner of Littman Krooks, a New York law firm that specializes in elder law. "Not only did they do the smart thing, the morally, ethically right thing, they did the legally conservative thing as well."

Krooks explained that the bank likely wouldn't be exposed if it had disbursed the funds, given the doctor's assessment of the client's mental capacity, but it wouldn’t be exposed by refusing to disburse the funds either.  The more conservative approach, he said, was the better way to go because "you're not subjecting yourself to disbursing the funds inappropriately." 

Freedman also applauded the bank's decision.  "I'm impressed they got a doctor and a lawyer," he said.  "I think they did everything right."

Freedman criticized the legal and medical assessment, saying the doctor and lawyer should have been aware of frontal-lobe dementia, a type of dementia that is harder to pin down and hasn't gotten too much attention. "It's not straight dementia," with the characteristic forgetfulness and loss of memory, he said.  Frontal-lobe dementia involves difficulty with judgment and executive functioning, Freedman explained.

"The problem with the medical and legal diagnosis is there's no real standard to determine whether or not somebody has the capacity to enter into these kinds of transactions on their own," said Krooks. "People are allowed to do things that you and I would agree are not so smart but that doesn't necessarily mean they're incapacitated and need to have a guardian."

In the end, banks need to use common sense to guide their decisions. "This story would certainly not pass the smell test," Krooks said.  "Who pays taxes on lottery winnings before they get the winnings?"

Read More:

Next in Practice
More in Practice See All »
Comments (3)
So, what is being done about grabbing the criminals involved??
Posted by Alexander S | Wednesday, September 24 2014 at 9:55AM ET
Its really sounds nuts - who would fall for this? - but unfortunately this is so common and so widespread, far more than people think. And once these scammers find "a live one", they keep going back to the well for more. These victims are usually in a state of diminishing capacity, the stage before dimimshed capacity that makes them so vulnerable to undue influence by scammers and unscrupulous caregivers/family members, etc.. Wells Fargo should be commended for their actions - this is why these larger institutions are now bringing gerontologists on staff, to understand the aging process as it related to financial behavior. "Financial gerontologists" are desperately needed on all levels.
Posted by Julie B | Thursday, August 28 2014 at 1:41PM ET
The same thing happened to my father-in-law, he was wiring funds all around the world and was scammed for thousands of dollar! He sent money using Western Union to Costa Rica, Canada and South Africa. He wired $15K to a lady in California. We tried to stop him. It was very hard to make him understand that there was no lottery winnings. They intimidate him by calling him in his home phone and telling him to send the money. We need to bring an awareness to the elderly and the families of the tactics used by the scammers. My father-in-law had Parkinson's disease. He was 79 years old.
Posted by Minda T | Wednesday, August 27 2014 at 2:04PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.